Home News Country Region noi tro World Islamic Youth Sports Forum News Photogallery Wed Fri Videoga

Home News Country Region noi tro World Islamic Youth Sports Forum News Photogallery Wed Fri Videogaleria Audiogaleria Factsheet - the family Corner Fatwa Articles Opinions Art Tech Other About Us
Islam is part of the Constitution of Luxembourg Scandalous, "Birra Tirana" on its cover sets mosque (Photo) pollution of Tetovo - Al Jazeera Balkans emission Erdogan: The attacks on Prophet Muhammad, Muslims red line shocking mystery of Kaaba NASA
Gilbert K. Chesterton is the English novelist, essayist, poet, and author biography Catholic. The following noi tro is the extract from his book "What is this unfair to the world". "... This does not mean that the woman does not work, because my husband orders her so she obeys. In contrast, a woman works because she ordered her husband to work and he was not convinced ".
I - Vote-seekers non-military Well then, to come to this fair treatment, but unpleasant, opposition on vote-seekers is that they are vote-seeking military. On the contrary; is that they are not sufficiently military. A revolution is a military issue; he has all the military virtues; one of which is, that he arrives at an end. Both sides fight with deadly weapons, but under certain rules of an arbitrary honor; the party that wins back the governing noi tro party and the government continues. The purpose noi tro of civil war, as the aim of all civil wars, is peace. Vote-seekers can not be brought before a civil war in the military sense and decisive; primarily because they are women and secondly because they are very few women. But they can advance something else; that is entirely something else. They can not create the revolution; what they can create is anarchy; and the difference between the two is not an issue of violence, but a matter efficacy noi tro and finality.
Revolution, in its nature, produces governance; anarchy produces more than anarchy. People may have opinions that liked the cutting of heads by King Charles or Louis, but they can not deny that Bradshaw and Cromwell ruled that Carnot and Napoleon ruled. Someone was defeated, something happened. Disposal will end one day, obstruction does not end ever, once the rebellion noi tro takes the form of a disorder simply (instead of an attempt to reinforce a new order) to no more logical end; he can only nurture and renew itself again, eternally. If Napoleon had not wanted to become a consul, but would have loved to be only an inconvenience, he probably would have prevented any government, which came from the Revolution successful. It is this non-military quality to vote-seekers, which makes their problem surface. The problem is, that their action has not ultimately advantages of violence; he is not able to afford a test. War is a terrible noi tro thing; noi tro but it proves exactly two points: the number of supporters and unnatural courage. One can detect two crucial issues: noi tro the rebels are alive and how many are ready to give their lives. But a very small part of them could live eternally disorder. Also these women are characterized by their inability to violate, which is part of the female sex. It is not true to state, that it is simply a matter of brute force. If muscles are those that give a man a vote, then his horse must have two votes and his elephant five. The truth is thinner noi tro than this. The truth is, the explosion of anger is a weapon instinctively husband, as the hooves are on a horse or elephant tusks are. Every riot is a threat of war, but the woman is vringëllirë a gun, you can not ever use, while there are plenty of weapons, and that it can actually use. But again we must remember that for this, first, it is necessary to bring all women in mind. This brings us to the end of the political noi tro surface of the case. Opposition works best against the philosophy of vote-seekers, is simply overpowering measures of millions of women do not agree with. I am aware that some of the women defend the idea that women should have the vote, and the majority of them do not cares, if they will or not; while this fact certainly remains a matter of strange and childish formal democracy building to the destruction of real democracy. What would be able to put women when they can not establish their place overall in the state? These people noi tro practically say that women can vote for anything; can only vote for their vote.
But my conscience clean again by my opinion purely political and perhaps unpopular, will rebound back again and will try to address the issue in a more ngad